Why these 50 questions specifically?

I started with ~140 candidate questions drawn from 9 years of incident logs, then iteratively cut to the smallest set that:

  • Catches 80%+ of real production incidents in advance. Adding more questions hits diminishing returns fast, each marginal question above 50 catches less new variance.
  • Covers the 5 categories evenly (10 questions each). Real Magento ops failures are roughly evenly split across security / performance / SEO / B2B / ops; an 8-question SEO category and a 14-question security category would skew the overall grade.
  • Is answerable in 5 minutes by a senior operator without code-reading. If a question would require running a query or grepping a log, it becomes a “skip if unsure” question instead of being on the list.
  • Avoids vendor-specific bias. No “are you using product X.” Yes/no/skip on real engineering checks, not marketplace endorsements.

The full candidate list (the 140) lives in the deep-audit. If your in-page checklist score is C or below, the 90 extra questions in the deep audit are probably where the real failures hide.

Kishan Savaliya
Kishan Savaliya
Adobe Certified Magento Commerce Developer
Ahmedabad [IN]working hours, replies within four hours
When do you need it

Read personally. Never shared. Or email the brief.

More on magento store health checklist

Need it fixed, not just explained?

Send the brief with your store URL; the written quote comes back within 24 hours.