Performance / Core Web Vitals, how do they compare?

BigCommerce defaults to good Core Web Vitals on Stencil + their CDN: LCP under 2.5s on average for stock themes, decent INP, low CLS. SaaS hosting is tuned by their infra team, you don’t need a performance specialist.

Magento default Luma is poor on CWV. Magento on Hyvä is excellent: LCP under 1.5s achievable with proper hosting + caching (we’ve hit 1.0s on production stores). But it requires the right setup, Hyvä theme + Varnish + Redis + a competent host + optimized images. Without those, default Magento can hit 5s LCP and tank Lighthouse.

Net: BC is good-by-default. Magento is great-with-effort. If your team can’t / won’t invest in DevOps, BC is the safer CWV bet. With a Hyvä team, Magento beats BC on raw speed.

Kishan Savaliya
Kishan Savaliya
Adobe Certified Magento Commerce Developer
Ahmedabad [IN]working hours, replies within four hours
When do you need it

Read personally. Never shared. Or email the brief.

More on magento vs bigcommerce

Need it fixed, not just explained?

Send the brief with your store URL; the written quote comes back within 24 hours.