Figma to code, in hours.

I run Claude Code as an AI pair-designer-engineer against your real Figma file and codebase. Design tokens auto-extracted, WCAG 2.2 AA on every component, Storybook + visual-regression CI shipped alongside the build, and zero pixel-shift surprises.

  • Free 24h Figma audit + component-inventory plan
  • Tailwind / Hyvä / Bootstrap / vanilla CSS: your stack
  • Single Page $499 · Design System Sprint $2,999 · Retainer custom
Hours
Figma → code
AI-paired Figma-to-code in hours, not weeks, React, Vue, Hyvä phtml or vanilla HTML, your stack of choice.
WCAG
2.2 AA every component
Every component ships with proper ARIA roles, keyboard nav, focus rings, and contrast checks, auto-audited via axe-core in CI.
Auto
Design tokens
Color, spacing, radius, typography tokens auto-extracted from Figma into Tailwind config / CSS vars / Style Dictionary.
0
Visual regressions
Chromatic / Percy / BackstopJS wired up day one. No surprise pixel-shifts on stage. Every PR ships with a visual diff.

Six reasons teams hire an AI-paired designer-engineer

Claude Code isn’t a code-generator that spits template-y components. It reads your real Figma file, your real design tokens, your real codebase, then writes accessible, on-brand components that pixel-match the design and pass axe-core on day one.

  • Figma file → production code, one shot

    Drop a Figma URL, Claude Code reads frames, components, auto-layout, variants and tokens via the Figma MCP server, then writes React, Vue, Hyvä phtml or HTML that pixel-matches the design with proper semantic structure.

  • Design-system tokens auto-extracted

    Color, spacing, radius, typography, shadows, pulled from your Figma styles into tailwind.config.js, :root CSS vars, Style Dictionary, or CSS-in-JS theme, one source of truth from designer to developer.

  • Accessibility-first by default

    Every component ships with proper ARIA roles, keyboard navigation, visible focus states, contrast-checked color pairs, and screen-reader labels. axe-core runs in CI, no PR merges with a11y violations.

  • Tailwind, Hyvä, Bootstrap, vanilla CSS

    Your stack, your rules. Claude Code adapts output to your existing utility framework or hand-rolled CSS, no forced rewrites, no “you must use Tailwind” opinions. BEM, SMACSS, CSS Modules, CSS-in-JS, all supported.

  • Storybook stories shipped alongside

    Every component ships with a Storybook story file: variants, states, dark-mode, error-state, loading-state, controls. Designers see and approve in isolation before integration. Auto-generated docs from JSDoc / PHPDoc.

  • Visual regression CI on day one

    Chromatic, Percy, BackstopJS or Playwright visual snapshots wired to GitHub Actions / GitLab CI on the first PR. Every change shows pixel-diffs to the team. Designer approval before merge, no surprises in production.

Five steps from Figma to production-ready components

Daily Storybook + staging URL update from day three. You see, and approve, every component before merge.

  1. 01Brief & Figma audit

    Day 1

    Share Figma + brand guide. Claude Code reads frames, components, tokens and variants. Written audit of design-system completeness, accessibility gaps, and component count within 24h.

  2. 02Wireframe & scope

    Day 2

    Component inventory + page-by-page scope, you see exactly which components ship in which sprint. Token map locked. Approved before a single line of code.

  3. 03AI-paired build

    Days 3-18

    I drive, Claude Code assists. Daily commits with axe-core + Storybook + visual-regression CI green. Daily Storybook + staging URL update, you see progress every working day.

  4. 04A11y & visual QA

    Days 18-21

    Lighthouse a11y 100, axe-core 0 violations, manual screen-reader pass (NVDA + VoiceOver), keyboard-only flow, contrast 4.5:1+. Visual diff approved by designer before any merge to main.

  5. 05Stabilise

    Days 21-35

    14 days post-launch coverage. Pixel + a11y bug fixes are free if they trace to our build. Optional retainer afterwards (USD 1,499/mo) for embedded designer-engineer support, design-system maintenance, new components, audits.

Fixed prices. No per-hour surprises.

Three engagement shapes. Anything out of scope after the audit gets quoted upfront before work starts, never billed silently.

Prices in USD. Quotes available in GBP / EUR / AUD / INR, ask in the booking form. Anthropic API costs (Claude Pro / Team / API) are billed directly by Anthropic and are typically < 5% of project total.

  • Single Page / Component

    $499

    3-5 days · one screen, end-to-end

    Best for: A landing page, a checkout step, a dashboard widget, a hero section, one well-scoped Figma frame turned into production code.

    • AI-paired Claude Code Figma audit
    • React / Vue / Hyvä phtml / HTML output
    • WCAG 2.2 AA + axe-core green
    • Storybook story + visual snapshot
    • Tailwind / Bootstrap / CSS-Modules
    • 14 days post-launch coverage
    Send a brief
  • Design System Sprint

    $2,999

    3-4 weeks · most popular

    Best for: Full design-system rollout: tokens, 25-40 components, Storybook, visual-regression CI, theming, a production-ready library your dev team can build on.

    • Everything in Single Page, plus:
    • 25-40 components from Figma
    • Token pipeline: Figma → Tailwind / CSS vars
    • Storybook + Chromatic / Percy CI
    • Light + dark mode theming baked in
    • Designer-engineer pairing on every PR
    • 14 days post-launch coverage
    Send a brief
  • Embedded Designer-Engineer

    Custom

    Monthly retainer · full-time integration

    Best for: Teams that want an AI-paired senior designer-engineer embedded for 3+ months, design-system stewardship, component library expansion, a11y audits, design-QA on every team PR.

    • Everything in Design System Sprint, plus:
    • Embedded into your Jira / Linear / Trello board
    • Async design-QA on every team PR
    • Quarterly design-system + a11y audit
    • New component design + build on demand
    • On-call cover for design-system breakages
    • Volume discount on AI-assisted dev hours
    Send a brief

Reserve your AI-paired design sprint

Booking takes 2 minutes: we reply with a written Figma audit + quote within 24 hours.

  • "After trying and failing with multiple development companies Kishan came to the rescue in our hour of need."MLMichael Lin, Natonic
  • "Where others quoted 10 hours minimum, he did it within 3."PVPieter Van Hees, Business Branding
  • "Sorted out my issue within an hour!"SZSteve Zed
Kishan Savaliya
Kishan Savaliya
Adobe Certified Magento Commerce Developer
Ahmedabad [IN]working hours, replies within four hours

Replies in under 4 hours on IST working days. The quote follows within 24 hours.

When do you need it

Read personally. Never shared. Or email the brief.

Trusted by teams in

Honest answers about using Claude Code for UI / UX

Can Claude Code actually read my Figma file?

Yes, via the official Figma MCP server (Model Context Protocol). Once connected with a Figma personal access token, Claude Code can pull frames, components, auto-layout properties, variants, design tokens (color, type, spacing, effects), and even individual node JSON. It reads structure not just pixels, so the generated code uses your actual component names, your actual token names, and respects your auto-layout intent. We set this up day one of every project. Without MCP, we fall back to high-fidelity screenshots + token JSON exported from Figma plugins (Style Dictionary, Tokens Studio).

Does Claude Code write accessible components by default?

Yes, we encode WCAG 2.2 AA as a hard rule in CLAUDE.md: every interactive element gets a proper role, accessible name, keyboard handler, visible focus ring, and aria-state attributes (aria-expanded, aria-pressed, aria-current, aria-invalid, etc.). We pair Claude Code with axe-core in CI, no PR merges with a11y violations. Color-contrast is checked against tokens at design-token compile time, so a 4.4:1 pair fails the build before code is even written. Manual NVDA + VoiceOver pass before sign-off on any complex widget (dialogs, comboboxes, date pickers).

Tailwind vs CSS-in-JS, which does Claude Code prefer?

Whichever your codebase uses. We don’t force a stack. Claude Code reads your existing patterns, if your repo has tailwind.config.js with custom theme keys, it generates Tailwind utility classes. If it has styled-components with a theme provider, it writes styled blocks against your theme tokens. If it has CSS Modules with BEM, it writes .Component_root__xyz classes. The token pipeline (Figma → theme) adapts: Tailwind config keys, CSS variables, Style Dictionary platforms, or theme-provider object, same Figma source, different output.

Can Claude Code generate Storybook stories alongside components?

Yes, this is a hard rule in our design-system projects. Every component ships with a colocated *.stories.tsx (or .stories.mdx) file containing: (a) the default state; (b) all design-token variants from Figma; (c) error / loading / empty / disabled states; (d) dark-mode variant; (e) Storybook controls (knobs) for every prop; (f) auto-generated docs from JSDoc / TypeScript types. Stories run in Chromatic for visual regression on every PR. Designers approve in Storybook before integration into the app.

Will the output match my design-system tokens, not Tailwind defaults?

Yes, that’s the whole point. Claude Code reads your token source (Figma styles, tokens.json, tailwind.config.js, Style Dictionary output) and writes code that only uses those tokens, never raw #ff0000, never raw 16px. We add an ESLint rule (tailwindcss/no-arbitrary-value or a custom no-magic-number rule) that fails the build if a non-token value sneaks in. Tokens flow Figma → tokens.jsontailwind.config.js + CSS vars → component code → rendered UI, one source of truth from designer to user.

How does Claude Code handle dark mode and multi-brand theming?

Token-driven, semantic-named. We write tokens with semantic names (--color-bg-surface, --color-text-default, --color-action-primary) not literal names (--gray-100). Claude Code emits CSS variables on :root for light, :root[data-theme="dark"] for dark, and additional brand themes via data-brand attributes. Every component reads from semantic tokens only, so flipping data-theme instantly re-themes the entire UI. Storybook ships with a theme switcher addon so designers approve all variants before merge.

Is the AI design output original, not template-y?

The output is your design, executed in code, not Claude’s opinion of how a button should look. Claude Code reads your Figma frames pixel-by-pixel (via MCP or screenshots), uses your tokens, your typography, your spacing scale, the visual result is identical to your designer’s file. We don’t use AI to design the UI (that’s your designer’s job); we use AI to translate a finished design into accessible, on-brand code. If your designs are original, your code will be too.

Magento Hyvä vs vanilla web, does the workflow change?

Output format changes, workflow stays identical. On Hyvä we emit .phtml files with Tailwind utility classes, Alpine.js x-data directives, and Magento layout XML wiring. On vanilla React we emit .tsx with semantic JSX, hooks, and the framework’s state management. Same Figma source, same tokens, same a11y rules, same Storybook setup, just different file extensions. We have separate slash-commands per stack: /scaffold-hyva-block, /scaffold-react-component, etc. See our Claude Code + Hyvä page for the Magento-specific deep-dive.

How pixel-perfect is the output vs the Figma design?

Within 1-2px on first pass, pixel-identical after visual-QA. Claude Code reads Figma auto-layout (gaps, padding, alignment) and pulls exact token values, so spacing, typography, and color match by construction. Where AI-only output drifts, complex shadows, gradients, micro-animations, we run a Percy or Chromatic visual diff against a Figma export and fix any pixel deltas before merge. We commit to a 99%+ visual match on simple components and 95%+ on complex ones (data viz, charts, custom illustrations).

Does Claude Code handle responsive / mobile-first properly?

Yes, mobile-first by default, with breakpoints driven by your design tokens, not magic numbers. We pair every component with three Storybook viewports (mobile 375px, tablet 768px, desktop 1280px) and visual-snapshot all three. Claude Code reads your Figma responsive variants (Figma now has device-frame variants and breakpoint constraints) and emits matching media queries or Tailwind sm: / md: / lg: prefixes. Touch-target sizes are checked against WCAG 2.5.5 (44×44 CSS px minimum). Container queries (@container) used where component-context responsiveness beats viewport-based.

How does visual regression CI work with AI-generated code?

Day-one wiring on every project. We push every Storybook story to Chromatic (or Percy / BackstopJS) on first PR. From then on, every commit auto-snapshots all stories, if a single pixel changes anywhere, the PR shows a side-by-side diff. Designer or design-engineer approves the diff before merge to main. AI-generated code is held to the same bar as human-written code, no exemption, no shortcut. Across 40+ projects, this has caught dozens of subtle regressions (focus rings, hover states, dark-mode contrast bugs) that would otherwise have shipped to production.

What if AI-generated code introduces a visual or a11y bug post-launch?

14 days of free post-launch coverage on every project, same warranty whether the code came from human keystrokes or AI suggestions. Bug-fix scope: pixel mismatches, a11y violations, broken focus states, contrast failures, keyboard-trap bugs, screen-reader breakage, anything that traces back to our build. After day 14, optional retainer (USD 1,499/mo) for embedded designer-engineer support. What’s not covered: bugs in your existing code we didn’t touch, third-party widgets, server / hosting failures. Every bug fix is itself reviewed by Claude Code + a human + visual-regression diff before re-deploy, so we don’t paper over root causes.

Send a brief. Get a written quote in 24 hours.

Two paragraphs is enough: scope, price and timeline come back in writing.